On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:53:46 +0800 Yao Qi <y...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> LP:602190(https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/602190) and > LP:602285(https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/602285) are > related to this patch below. You can get more details from comments > of these bugs, since I've added my understand of the cause in > comments. > > This patch is to improve the performance of generated code, however, > these two bugs are related to this patch(, correct me if I am wrong). > Now, we have two options, 1) revert this patch, and make these test > case pass; 2) keep this patch and fix test cases, 3) fix bugs and keep > this patch, > > What do you think? I don't particularly like the "CSL LOCAL" markers in a non-CSL-local branch, but I don't think that's what you're asking :-). We're talking about the Linaro 4.4 branch here, right? I'm planning to add appropriate "-fno-unroll-loops" options to affected tests on the 4.5 branch (that is not done yet), but I wasn't planning to do the same for 4.4. I don't see why we can't though. Julian _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
