...are available at:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.5+bzr99315/

I've also finished reference builds of FSF GCC 4.4.4, 4.5.0, and
4.5.1.  According to the GCC testsuite, there are no regressions
between the Linaro and FSF branches and in some ways we're a bit
better:

On x86_64 for FSF 4.5.0 (-) vs linaro-4.5+bzr99315 (+):
                 === gcc Summary ===

-# of expected passes           61211
+# of expected passes           61239
+# of unexpected successes      1
-# of expected failures         180
+# of expected failures         179
 # of unsupported tests         825

On i686 FSF 4.5.0 vs linaro-4.5+bzr99315:
                 === gcc Summary ===

-# of expected passes           62285
+# of expected passes           62309
 # of unexpected failures       12
-# of unexpected successes      25
+# of unexpected successes      26
-# of expected failures         192
+# of expected failures         191
 # of unsupported tests         533

g++, fortran, and objc are the same between builds.

And, strangely enough, ARM is still building.

-- Michael

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to