On 8/2/22 07:33, なつよるほたる wrote:
I found an interesting project protected by Apache-2.0 in github. Now I
want to modify some functions and some new features to develop a new
software based on the original project. Naturally I want to fork it and
start my coding, but there is a confusing thing, should I fulfill the
obligation of *Redistribute with Modification, *especially the 2.nd
term, changelog related.
You must honor licensing terms. However, the terms do not _require_ you
to waste your (and others) time on polluting every modified source file
with an ever-growing list of humans and bots that have touched it. The
lawyers should not have relied on an overly specific term "file" in a
general-purpose software license, but they gave us enough wiggle room to
work around their shortcomings.
For example, IMO, the "prominent notice" may come in a form of "See the
NOTICE file for details about this software modifications." text
included in the beginning of every file (and the corresponding NOTICE
file where you do record your name). This works especially well if you
distribute your software via a version-control system that publishes
every modification as metadata (e.g., GitHub).
Cheers,
Alex.
1. You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a
copy of this License; and
2. _You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and_
3. You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You
distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution
notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices
that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and
4. If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within
such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any
part of the Derivative Works, in at least one of the following
places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the
Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation, if
provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display
generated by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party
notices normally appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for
informational purposes only and do not modify the License. You may
add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You
distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the
Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be
construed as modifying the License.
Best regards,
Aaron
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
