On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > Yes the idea is interesting. > > So you avoid giving a "blank check" to the FSF by giving another to OSI... > > I assume that both organisations are safe :-) > > My intention is actually to avoid giving a blank check to any > organization: a new version of the GPL would have to be published by > FSF, but for it to be considered valid for my code it'd need to be OK-ed > by OSI.
Hello, no reply after a month and a half. Would OSI be happy being used as such a guarantor, and if so, could some of you help wording the addition to the license statement? Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
