I think the earlier versions, however, should be put in the "superseded" category to capture any legacy uses? That's how others have been handled.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lawrence Rosen <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 8:08 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? > > McCoy is correct. Versions of AFL and OSL **prior to version 3.0** are no > longer valid. Please remove those earlier versions. /Larry > > Lawrence Rosen > 707-478-8932 > 3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482 > > -----Original Message----- > From: License-discuss <[email protected]> On > Behalf Of McCoy Smith > Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? > > Since that's Larry Rosen's license, he'd probably know best. I talked to him > last week, should I ping him? I think he's on this list. > I think what probably happened is the older versions got superseded in favor > of the newer versions, although typically that's shown in the superseded list. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: License-discuss <[email protected]> > > On Behalf Of VM (Vicky) Brasseur > > Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:13 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? > > > > Hi, folks! > > > > The SPDX folks are trying to sort out the status of the versions of > > the Academic Free License prior to v3.0. > > > > Basically, the Wayback Machine shows that the earlier versions are > > OSI- approved but they're not showing that way on the site anymore. > > Searching the list archives didn't turn up any information that would > clear > > things up. > > > > Does anyone have any information about these? > > > > See this GitHub issue for details: > > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1327 > > > > --V > > > > _______________________________________________ > > The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not > > necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements > > by > the > > Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. > > > > License-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license- > > discuss_lists.opensource.org > > > _______________________________________________ > The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not > necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the > Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. > > License-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensourc > e.org _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
