In Debian we have received the following bug report: Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Comparing the definition of i965_proc_picture here: > > http://sources.debian.net/src/intel-vaapi-driver/1.3.1-1/src/i965_post_processing.c?hl=5314,5315#L5314 > > and the declaration as well as the use: > > http://sources.debian.net/src/intel-vaapi-driver/1.3.1-1/src/gen75_picture_process.c?hl=41,42,66,67#L41 > > it seems that not only should the declaration in gen75_picture_process.c be > adjusted, but gen75_vpp_fmt_cvt may wish to make actual use of the (error > reported) return value of i965_post_processing.
For the full bug report please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748555. The first patch fixes the return type of i965_proc_picture. The second patch changes gen75_vpp_fmt_cvt to forward the return value from i965_proc_picture. However, I'm not sure if this is a good idea or not as the return value of gen75_vpp_fmt_cvt is never checked anyway. Cheers _______________________________________________ Libva mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libva
