On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fortunately, all Linux/x86_64 systems support __thread, which doesn't suffer > from the same problem. > > Is there a particular reason you didn't use __thread? > If not, I'll send a patch.
Could you also add a test case to Ltest-nomalloc, so we catch any mallocs in the fast unwind path? Thanks. -Arun _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
