On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:45:26 pm Arun Sharma wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ken Werner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Zachary T Welch (4): > > Add ARM signal frame detection > > Add module for parsing ARM-specific unwind tables > > Use ARM-specific unwinding tables in unw_step > > Add test of backtracing using ARM-specific tables > > Applied. Thanks. Had to fix up some trailing whitespace and use > $LIBUNWIND_ELF instead of libunwind-elf32.la (which doesn't work on 64 > bit platforms).
Hi Arun, An updated version of this patch set got just posted at: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.unwind.devel/902 After learning more about the internals of libunwind I decided to replace the arm_stackframe and let the extbtl-parser operate on the dwarf_cursor directly. This eliminates the need to synchronize the two models and clears the way for call stacks with mixed DWARF- and extbl-frames. It also fixes the testcase errors that Henrik reported. Since the first version of the patch set went upsteam the updated series won't apply anymore. How do we want to proceed here? Do you want me to rebase the new series against the current head or do you wan't to revert the initial patch set? Thanks, Ken _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
