On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:49 +0200, Lassi Tuura wrote: > > But I have debug output from my original problem. Here are the last > > lines before it segfaults: > > >> _ULarm_dwarf_find_proc_info: IP=0x407adfe7 not found > >> put_rs_cache: unmasking signals/interrupts and releasing lock > >> _ULarm_dwarf_step: returning -10 > >> _ULarm_step: dwarf_step()=-10 > >> _ULarm_step: dwarf_step() failed (ret=0), trying frame-chain > > Great, thanks. How did it come to considering IP=0x407adfe7? In other > words what's the debug output for the frame above?
The frame above is always __default_sa_restorer() from /lib/libc.so.0. At least that's what my backtrace outputs before it segfaults. For now I have backed out the experimental frame-chain unwinding for the ARM platform. But I am willing to help you to debug this further. Sven _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
