On 6/20/2010 2:31 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: > Tested on cygwin, mingw, linux, and works. But, given the issues > raised above...comments? discussion? Additional testing on esoteric > platforms? OK to push? > > NOTE: From the autoconf manual: > Posix prefers `setenv' to `putenv'; among other things, `putenv' > is not required of all Posix implementations, but `setenv' is. > Unfortunately, MinGW and MSVC do not provide setenv but DO provide > _putenv. Unless we want to extend the test using a custom > setenv implementation in terms of putenv for these two platforms, > (as done in the cwrapper code), and otherwise use setenv...this > seems simpler. But if we really CAN'T rely on putenv's presence... > > Maybe uglification is the better way to go for this issue.
Ping? -- Chuck
