On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:33:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2007 12:36:13 -0600, "Tom Tromey" > said: > > >>>>> "Charles" == Charles Wilson writes: > > Charles> Secondly, the entire contents of libjava/libltdl/ need to be > > Charles> updated. > > > > I don't think we need to do this. libgcj uses libltdl primarily as a > > portable wrapper for dlopen. As such it works just fine as is. > > Well, it /did/ -- until the new-libtool merge. Now there seem to be > build problems. So /something/ needs fixin'. <g> > > > Also, > > libgcj has some local libltdl patches as well. > > Then they should be submitted upstream -- if they are still necessary. > There have been a lot of improvements in libltdl since 1.4.x and even > 1.5.x. > > > Why do you think it should be updated? > > Because unless I am very mistaken, new libtool.m4 + old ltdl.m4(&other > old libltdl stuff) is not a tested/supported configuration -- it /may/
Libjava will build with patches in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg02031.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01820.html H.J.
