Drew DeVault <[email protected]> writes:
> [ Disclaimer: I am affliated with SourceHut. ] > > No one was born with knowledge of how to use GitHub. As someone who > frequently uses both GitHub and email, noobs are no stranger to either > platform. Many of us just don't remember very well our first few crappy > GitHub pull requests, from before we really understood the workflow. > > If you appeal to popularity as the ultimate decider, then novel > approaches can never succeed. It's a defeatist attitude, and I reject > it outright. Hey, thanks for posting. I think we didn't properly characterize the email thing well on the evaluation page and I've updated it. sr.ht has made things way easier than a plain mailman list and I don't think it would stop us from choosing it. Its listed as a pro and a con, and depending on your perspective is how it balances. The lack of linking between repo and lists and bugs is was listed as an issue in our review already, and I think thats a bigger issue. If there was some improvement around this, even if its not the final state, that would be a huge reason to consider it more highly. For example, if I go to a repo, its unclear how to file a bug for it. I created a new repo for a new project, its unclear you generally want to create a list and a bug tracker with the same name. Those kinds of things. -- Ian Kelling | Senior Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: B125 F60B 7B28 7FF6 A2B7 DF8F 170A F0E2 9542 95DF https://fsf.org | https://gnu.org
