On 14/06/13 16:11, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Im not too happy with essentially shutting down all development on master on > one application for an undefined timeframe. Can we make this a bit more > bearable by:
Bjoern, just read it again. He is asking not to merge changes like german comments or the wholesale string/sal_Bool changes that are low priority but complicate life when one tries to rebase changes. He also did not speak about indefinite. Kohei is know to be a fast and concise fellow, so don't worry, it will not take the same time as chart2. He just implores the clemency of the pears to make his re-factoring less of PITA. F. > a/ a concrete timeframe, I would suggest until the 2013-06-30 > (with the option to extend the block another week a few days before the end > should the need arise) > b/ make that work trackable and visible on a regularly pushed branch (maybe > even regularly rebased), so it easier to see where possible conflicts arise > c/ instead of suggesting to stop all work on calc, divert those changes to > gerrit, were those could stay "on hold" until the refactoring is done, and > be merged in due time afterwards ... > > Note also that some string refactorings or friends are global (e.g. removing a > member function), and excluding these would block all of LO, which is > obviously > not a good thing. > > Best, > > Bjoern > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
