Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote
> ...
> This leaves us with completely unmaintainable ("where do I need to lock
> SolarMutex?"---"nobody knows for sure") and broken (cf.
> SolarMutexReleaser) code.
> ...
Should/can "SolarMutex" be removed?
If yes, I suppose it's not simple and perhaps there's a lot of work ahead
(so for 4.2 version?) but would there be anything (eg tedious/long but easy
to do) which could be done as a prerequisite?
Julien
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/SolarMutex-please-educate-me-tp4055778p4055959.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
