Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 03. 05. 2013 v 18:19 +0200:
> Well, yeah. And when we wait half a day, we could also collect all the > unpushed > fixes in _one_ mail and not start one thread for each. We could go fancy and > call this mail "digest". ;) Digest with N patches in a lump kills the possibility to scan the content quickly, so wouldn't work for anybody, and would be just a waste. > I dont see the need to track the status of patches via flaky "PUSHED" "PATCH" > subjects of emails -- at least for patches on gerrit, gerrit has a much better > way of keeping track of things as it tracks and watches the repository > directly. Those who merge most of the patches should decide what works for them best I believe. Definitely it is not me, so I actually apologize for promoting my workflow, but it's easy to find out using OLD="" ; COUNT=0 ; git log | grep 'Reviewed-by:' | sort | while read NAME ; do if [ "$OLD" != "$NAME" ] ; then echo "$COUNT $OLD" ; OLD="$NAME" ; COUNT=0 ; fi ; COUNT=$(($COUNT+1)) ; done | sort -r -n that the 10 most active are Caolán, Fridrich, Thomas, Michael S., Norbert, Miklos, David T., Tor, Andras, Olivier. Also consider the long tail here - how do you want to grow the amount of people who merge patches, when it will be hidden in gerrit only or a different / not default mailing list? All the best, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
