On 25/04/13 13:29, Miklos Vajna wrote: > TemplateContent::TemplateContent gets an INetURLObject, and the next > assert fails, as GetProtocol() is INET_PROT_NOT_VALID. If you step up > the backtrace in gdb, you see that the "URL" was ~memory garbage. > > On the other hand, for now I would just change back the cache format. > Does that make sense? > > I mean if you are OK with pushing > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/lo-core/commit/?id=83544b27f3dcfb132b3eb46d387f62ebc9c3e160 > to master. And then this can be still discussed (if it's OK to change > this format or not, if hundred/nano seconds matter for templates or not, > etc) without being in a hurry.
argh... there is a binary format "template cache" in the user profile? what would happen if the incompatibly changed format loading code were deployed to users with a pre-existing cache in the old format? ceterum censeo formatos binarios delendam sunt. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
