On 02/15/2013 07:27 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative" library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS, except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of libfoolo.so. On dmake/build.pl and esp. with a dmake/build.pl/gbuild mix such a change would have been needlessly painful because of the many places, were such a name would show up.
The sourpuss that I am can't help but point out that that "lib" prefix is a concession to the idiosyncrasies of the linker, and has no place in libraries that nobody links against. But if it helps... ;)
Stephan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
