On 08/02/13 17:50, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On 02/08/2013 07:31 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> The hitch with announcing changes in micro releases is that the >> lexicographical order of release numbers does not necessarily match the >> chronological order of releases, so what does it mean if some change is >> in "since LO 4.0.2" if LO 4.1 has been released before LO 4.0.2? > > But we have the same problem with bug fixes, no? We say this bug is > fixed in version x.y.z. And we don't seem to suffer from this supposed > hypothetical conundrum.
the bugzilla whiteboard field tends to contain stuff like "target:4.1.0 target:4.0.1" > If the need really arises, then we can easily list two versions anyway > i.e. (since 4.0.2/ 4.1, or something like that. AFAIK extensions may specify a single "minimum version" and if they rely on some newly introduced API then that may become messy if that API is introduced at different points in different release branches. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
