On 10/09/2012 01:59 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Where did this lcl_ convention come from? The lcl_ prefix has no meaning to a compiler or linker. If the intent is to make such functions file-local, why not use the static keyword, or an anonymous namespace instead, so that they actually *are* local also to the tool-chain? (You can still keep the lcl_ prefix if you love it.)
For the record, I hate this convention and I purposefully don't follow it myself.
It just looks ugly. That's all my reason against it. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
