On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:30 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > as already discussed on IRC is review -1/-2 completely wrong here > (well from my point of view!). > Actualy gerrit is missing that WORK IN PROGRESS (WIP) feature.
Fine, when gerrit acquire that feature we will revisit that. > With WIP you want visibility, (possibly) earlier feedback and even tinderbox > checks. No. If it is ready for tinderbox check then it is ready for submission. If it is truly a work in progress that should not be merged, then there is no reason to waste tinbuild time on it yet. > > In fact if you think gerit is lack some feature, then first thing to check > is > what the gerrit's power users did - openstack project: > > open stack guys patched gerrit and added WIP feature to it! > We should probably just pick their gerrit version: Absolutely no. Gerrit is a critical _tool_ that we _use_ in _production_ Stability trump eye-candy and convenience features here. I am strongly opposed to deploy anything but upstream-blessed stable version.... and even, by prudence, the admin team will probably wait 3-4 weeks after a new upstream release before deploying it. Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
