On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 16:52 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> ...where DECL_LINK is independent of UNO
True - but is a horror ;-)
> Right, what you save compared to current UNO is that on the listener's
> end you do not need to explicitly implement a specific UNO interface
> (instead, you only need to explicitly implement a function with a
> specific signature).
Right; that's so. Of course, in some languages eg. C# you can bind to
that with a delegate requiring no function definition ;-)
> So what one would gain is improvement in ease of declaration and use (by
> increased succinctness). Type safe argument passing would be just as
> type safe as today.
I suppose so; assuming people are up for creating new listener
interfaces today, rather than trying to re-use more generic ones -
yes :-)
HTH,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
