On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:51:48 +0200, Thorsten Behrens
<[email protected]> wrote:

Marco Cecchetti wrote:
>Slightly tangential - how about filing a few easy hacks for adding
>more shape and slide animations? It's mostly busy work, and a nice
>rewarding experience for new hackers - here's how:
>
>  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks

Ok, I appended it to my to do list.
Is there some animation you're especially interested in ?

Nope - maybe best to have something of two meta-easy-hack bugs, that just
links to
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sd/xml/effects.xml

and

 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sd/xml/transitions.xml

such that people can pick their favourite?

Yes, I think is the best solution, how should I categorize them ?
Is EasyHack,DifficultyBeginner,SkillJavaScript,SkillCpp ok ?
What about LibO version and importance settings ?

>With the pending changes, would you want to create a new
>features/svg-export2 branch & stick them in there for me & others to
>play?

Just to be sure I got it correctly:
do you mean a new branch separated from the feature/svg-export
branch where I push my contributions weekly ?

Yeah - since you merged feature/svg-export already, committing and
merging that again (I think) gives a somewhat nasty non-linear git
history - best practice it seems is to create a new branch from
current master HEAD, and cherry-pick your outstanding
feature/svg-export commits into that.

Well, I did that but I named the new branch derived from master
HEAD feature/svg-export again. Is that confusing ?

-- Marco


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to