> > Just curious: what's the big difference between rtl::OUString and > > std::string ? > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-March/028485.html > (and > click the next message link a couple of times).
Okay. Do situations where std::string doesnt suffice happen that often, that we need to OUString virtually everywhere ? I imagine lots of situations where even const char* is really enough. > I doubt any compiler we use treats std::string specially, I'd expect > it's a normal class for it just like any other. Honstly, I don't know. But I think it's certainly possible. That would be one of the first thing I tried when I wanted to write an good optimizing compiler. cu _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
