On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> wrote: >> I must say, of all the options so far, that one sound the most appealing to >> me. >> and it can be done 'incrementally', one module at the time... > > One could do the thing I suggested incrementally, too. > >> While we are at it, why not have just one public header file per >> module... > > But isn't this "module" terminology mostly wishful thinking in many > cases? I.e. some "modules" contain stuff that are not really related > much at all from a functionality point of view, and in other cases > stuff that one would imagine belongs together has been split into > several "modules" for obscure and/or obsolete reasons.
be that as it may, that would just be an incentive to actually fix these case... Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
