PROBLEMS | 2 -- common/Seccomp.cpp | 8 ++------ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
New commits: commit 72baaa231c87f8f71cb0ad60acef848f9c05b237 Author: Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> Date: Fri Jun 8 08:42:31 2018 +0300 We seemed to have just two minor ASCII art instances, actually Change-Id: I308cda537c26b1a9976e7bcf7634c67917a30163 diff --git a/PROBLEMS b/PROBLEMS index 1e8a1f66a..e044f5d8f 100644 --- a/PROBLEMS +++ b/PROBLEMS @@ -51,5 +51,3 @@ used just once or twice, passed as a parameter to a function, or used in a comparisin expression. This is fairly pointless and just makes the code harder to read. Use string literals instead. - -- ASCII art? Seriously? diff --git a/common/Seccomp.cpp b/common/Seccomp.cpp index fc276a8aa..e65e8b4ac 100644 --- a/common/Seccomp.cpp +++ b/common/Seccomp.cpp @@ -101,9 +101,7 @@ bool lockdown(Type type) // Load sycall number BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), - // ------------------------------------------------------------ - // --- First white-list the syscalls we frequently use. --- - // ------------------------------------------------------------ + // First white-list the syscalls we frequently use. ACCEPT_SYSCALL(recvfrom), ACCEPT_SYSCALL(write), ACCEPT_SYSCALL(futex), @@ -115,9 +113,7 @@ bool lockdown(Type type) ACCEPT_SYSCALL(close), ACCEPT_SYSCALL(nanosleep), - // ------------------------------------------------------------ - // --- Now block everything that we don't like the look of. --- - // ------------------------------------------------------------ + // Now block everything that we don't like the look of. // FIXME: should we bother blocking calls that have early // permission checks we don't meet ? _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
