On 06/01/12 14:24, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> in the case of pdfimport, isn't there a potential licensing problem >> because it uses GPL-licensed xpdf/poppler code? > > Ah OK. IANAL, so maybe indeed keeping it as an oxt then is relevant. > Still, what prevents us from saying that a particular build of this > "extension" as shipped with LO x.y, works only with LO x.y?
if it's that closely coupled to a particular version, then claiming it's an extension is just an exercise in deceptive advertising. either don't link against unstable LO libs, or stop shipping it as an extension. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
