Hi Noel,
On 06/11/17 07:42, Noel Grandin wrote:
> I just saw a comment
>
> // Class to read obsolete registered extensions
> // should be removed for LibreOffice 4.0
>
> which appears to have been introduced in
>
> commit 042247b3e428cb7352c06a670576819c67378090
> Author: Michael Meeks <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed Nov 16 16:59:39 2011 +0000
>
> Fixup legacy sleepycat db database usage for packages
>
> Previously empty legacy registered_packages.db databases were created
> unconditionally, at some efficiency and startup cost, despite these
> being deprectated since before version 3.2.
> We now handle version mismatches by warning on the console and ignoring
> these files.
>
> Anything there that I can nuke ?
That's an interesting one =) I guess 6.0 is a good substitute for 4.0 -
I imagine that back-compatibility with some corner-case of pre 3.2
releases (which were not LibreOffice ;-)
Then again - no idea if there is still a win there; but Stephan is
really the expert here (?) - quite possibly my comment was wrong ;-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
