On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:01:05AM +0000, Pedro Lino wrote: >> "> at best redundant with the git-sha... >> >> Redundant is good! > > And "at best redundant" is _not_ good. Esp. if it can be misunderstood by > nontechnical users.
and that is still only half of the problem: I still fail to see how a 'non-technical' user is going to get a date/timestamp associated with a given 'fix', unless he also has a git sha1 at which point the whole timestamp mess is moot (since you have then the two sha1 needed to get a definitive answer). Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
