At 4:47pm -0500 Thu, 08 Dec 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 13:05 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
More specifically, I wish there were a way to run exactly and only
one test (i.e. a single ::testFunction()).
Fine, sounds like a worthy goal. I suggest you hack cppunit to add
some magic macro wrappers to stringify the function name, and allow
some run-time parameter that will filter the tests immediately on
entry down to the one you want.
Oh! I didn't realize cppunit was open for hacking from our end. Let's
see ... looking through that directory then ... the basic workflow is to
write a patch to apply before we compile Cppunit, yes?
Also - it seems Noel Grandin is working on a (somewhat different)
re-hash of the note storage thing in his tree - worth not treading
on his feet there; but of course the more unit tests for note stuff
the merrier.
Cheers. If Noel is working on that, then I'll turn my attention to
something along the test lines. Given my $REAL_LIFE constraints, maybe
what I work on should fall farther from the LO critical path ...
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
