On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 00:08 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
> > Lol :-) I think Bjoern is just joking - we're well rid of that mess.
> > We'll soon re-discover the fragile bits of code after we change them in
> > future ;->
>
> Well I thought so already. Maybe we indeed should add a marker saying
> exactly that?
Nah - we should expunge all superstitious comments & as/when people
change fragile code & create bugs, hopefully they will re-write it, if
not - they'll create a bug, and the bug fixer (while getting ill reading
it) will hopefully re-write it :-)
> But then, what constitutes an old comment? Very often I found that the
> "JP with a date" comments were obviously added _after_ the original
> comment.
Really - trying to detect and annotate fragile pieces of code with
special comments is not a winning idea I think :-) so just carry on
removing junk 'JP 12345' comments without any concern ...
All the best,
Michael
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
