Le 10/10/2011 13:27, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 22:46 -0700, julien2412 wrote:
...
        Secondly Julien - your build is with debug=true - that can change
behaviour, but of course we should chase down those changed behaviours
and try to work out which is causing the grief [ almost certainly one of
the warnings ].

In fact, I used make debug=true for the test but it was useless since I compile the whole repo in debug (my autogen.lastrun includes these lines :
--enable-debug
--enable-dbgutil
--enable-symbols
)

        Otherwise - it's fairly hard to see what is going on here. In order to
get a 0x6 pointer and not crash or valgrind warning inside:

SfxObjectShellArr_Impl&      SfxApplication::GetObjectShells_Impl() const
{
     return *pAppData_Impl->pObjShells;
}

        which is not in-line; we must have a valid (global) pApp, -and- a valid
pApp->pAppData_Impl - since pObjShells is at some substantial offset
inside there. So - pObjShells must be NULL in error cf.
sfx2/source/inc/appdata.hxx.

        As Markus says it's hard for that to happen, unless the:

sfx2/source/appl/appinit.cxx's
        bool SfxApplication::Initialize_Impl()

        has caught an exception and not completed.

        Julien - it'd be wonderful (if you could) to build sfx2 from clean with
debug=true, put a breakpoint at: appinit.cxx:231 (say) run to there,
then [ from there ! ], do break __cxa_throw, and continue until we get
an exception, the post some exception traces from there.
I put a break on appinit.cxx:231 + break __cxa_throw, I pasted a first part here :
http://pastebin.com/NAX6AUrJ

then a second part here :
http://pastebin.com/BBepMkcY

If you need more info with different break or something, don't hesitate to tell me. Precision : to quickly do this test, I haven't git updated my repo today. (I'm going to do it now)
        Is that do-able ? And of course, I suspect we should have a
try { } catch () { fail_really_hard_even_in_non_debug_mode(); } in that
constructor,
For the moment I haven't put the try catch. Tell me if it's still useful and what's the best "fail_really_hard" (without breaking hardware :-) )
        Thanks ;-)
Thank YOU for having given me some support on this :-)
                Michael.
Julien.

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to