> Would it not be possible to add specific with/without switches for > features that require 3rd party libs?
We already have too much configurability. Remember, each new binary enable/disable or with/without switch we add doubles the number of combinations that we should test. Yeah, dream on, we all know that we won't be doing that, so each new binary option is then a potential problem when somebody in the future decides to use a combination nobody else has tried. > so users could choose which features they > really want in during the compile, making the build smaller if they > want to. "users" ? You must have a different definition of "user" than I have. Is our target market (= "users") really people who don't plan to do any code fixes or additions, but do want to be able to boast how they have built their own LibreOffice a bit more lightweight than that from their distro! > i can quite > ensure you that I am capable of running tests for on/off for each > swich weekly. And for each platform, and for a representative selection of distros in the Linux case? --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
