On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:02AM -0400, Ashod Nakashian <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Is this an unintentional coincidence that we're encouraged to cleanup, or
> is there a policy as-such?

I don't think it's intentional that std::make_shared is under-used.
Before introducing new calls to boost::make_shared, it's a good idea to
check if you can first convert that boost::shared_ptr to std::shared_ptr
first, and then use std::make_shared, though.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to