> I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two
> at most (unx and wnt). Thoughts ?
That will break cross-compilation as currently implemented. It isn't entirely
unthinkable that somebody might at some point want to cross-compile from some
(well, *the*) mainstream Linux platform, x86_64, to a rare Linux platform. So
any remoival of infromation from OUTPATH will cause a clash for such. Ditto for
cross-compilation from Intel Mac OS X to PowerPC Mac OS X, which in fact is the
cross-compilation setup that in theory should be the easiest to handle. (Even
if it is the one that has received least attention so far.) If we have just
one OUTPATH for all Unixes, the above won't work.
Also iOS ("unxiosr") and Android ("unxandr") would clash with a generic "unx".
(Sure, we could change the OUTPATH values for these two special cases, to, say,
"ios" and "and" if we want to stick to three letters. As such I don't see why
we should stick to three-letter codes, though; if we do what you suggest to
OUTPATH, surely we should get rid of odd pointless abbreviations and just spell
"unix" in full etc.)
--tml
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
