On Aug 28, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Mohammad Elahi wrote:
> static sal_Unicode *table_PersianWord_decade1[]={
> (sal_Unicode[]){0}, // 0
> (sal_Unicode[]){0x06cc, 0x06a9, 0}, // 1
> …
> };
>
> is not valid C++03 (and neither is Eike's version using the ArrUnicode
> typedef). To be standards conform (and hence maximally portable) would
> require the more verbose
> OK. But it is too verbose ;)
> Any other solution? what about the following:
>
> static sal_Unicode table_PersianWord_decade1[][MAX_LEN]={
> {0}, // 0
> {0x06cc, 0x06a9, 0}, // 1
> ...
> };
>
> Although it uses more memory, but it is less vebose.
> What's your opinion?
Should be OK, too (as the difference in lengths of the individual entries is
not too large)---I would make it an explicit "7" in such a case, though,
instead of a #define MAX_LEN 7.
-Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
