Hi Stephan, On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:38:54 +0200, Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/23/2015 07:39 AM, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> commit 5ca4acf877834c51d896268cf3dd390903b2248b (snip) > Just a small remark: With "plain" structs that only contain (public, > non-static) > member variables and no member functions, it often makes sense to not decorate > the member variable names. > > As there are no member functions, there is never any ambiguity whether use of > a > name denotes a member or local variable, and accessing the member variables > "from the outside" typically reads more natural as > > desc->pNode > > than as > > desc->m_pNode I agree the above argument is reasonable. Thanks a lot for your remark.
Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
