Hi Markus, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 15:24:31 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> - if ( (!pOUTextContent && !pOUText && !pOUTextValue)
> - && ( (pOUTextContent &&
> !pOUTextContent->getLength()) || !pOUTextContent )
> - && ( (pOUText && !pOUText->getLength()) || !pOUText )
> - && ( (pOUTextValue && !pOUTextValue->getLength()) ||
> !pOUTextValue ))
> + if (!pOUTextContent && !pOUText && !pOUTextValue)
Might it be that the original intention was
if ( (!pOUTextContent && !pOUText && !pOUTextValue)
|| ( (pOUTextContent &&
!pOUTextContent->getLength()) || !pOUTextContent )
|| ( (pOUText && !pOUText->getLength()) || !pOUText )
|| ( (pOUTextValue && !pOUTextValue->getLength()) ||
!pOUTextValue ))
instead? Just from looking at it, without having seen the context
around..
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
