Hi Michael, On Wednesday, 2011-08-24 12:54:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:07 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > But do you know if there is a reason except oox that the > > FormulaCompiler and the FormulaTokens are not in calc? > > IMHO this was a highly retrograde step that was taken. There is / was > no real problem with having a single formula compiler, in one place that > can parse lots of different types of formulae. See my previous mail, the actual reason to factor it out was the report designer wanted to use the formula wizard. > It would be far more efficient and sensible IMHO to simply pass the > incoming formula as strings over to the core: what we used to do before > the brave-new-re-write to use masses of UNO ;-) Yes and no.. simpler and more efficient yes, though the UNO filter approach could be used for other formula languages as well. Not that I do foresee some in the near future, but.. Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
