Hi Lubos,
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:02 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> And do we have somebody like that? Who can decide if it is ok to change the
> template to this version?
Yes - and yes it's fine.
> > Just an idea: IIRC we have a git hook
> > that warns about commiting files with merge conflict markers like
> > "<<<<<<", maybe we can have those in the template to try to ensure that
> > the missing parts are filled in?
I like Bjoern's idea :-) seems pretty fool-proof (even for quite
inventive fools).
The expectation is that we'll be adopting the (much simpler) MPLv2
header which reads [ in totality ]:
This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla
Public License version 2.0 (the “License”). You can obtain a
copy of the License at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
Of course, we'll need an AL2.0 notice below that as well, but -
hopefully it'll shrink down the bloat / shouting in the source.
HTH,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
