What was wrong about those two commits, that required reverting them?

On 06/23/2015 08:43 PM, Julien Nabet wrote:
commit 09b4cbe977c755a447f97034189b85998f358d79
Author: Julien Nabet <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Jun 23 20:42:13 2015 +0200

     Revert "Typo: repsent->represent"

     This reverts commit 338161a41d6e01b8e8d8752d9a38cc5c7a63f288.

diff --git a/bridges/test/java_remote/Bug107753_Test.java 
b/bridges/test/java_remote/Bug107753_Test.java
index 8dc4e5f..c83d5f1 100644
--- a/bridges/test/java_remote/Bug107753_Test.java
+++ b/bridges/test/java_remote/Bug107753_Test.java
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ import test.lib.TestBed;
   *
   * <p>Bug #107753# "Java UNO: Proxies should implement intuitive semantics of
   * equals and hashCode" requests that two proxies are equal if they represent
- * the same UNO object.  This implies that if two proxies represent the same 
UNO
+ * the same UNO object.  This implies that if two proxies repsent the same UNO
   * object, they must have the same hash code.</p>
   */
  public final class Bug107753_Test extends ComplexTestCase {
commit 262dbabe8e07f60d55461ab3fb2c26d37b86a311
Author: Julien Nabet <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Jun 23 20:41:33 2015 +0200

     Revert "Wrong comment with 'sal_True' instead of 'true'"

     This reverts commit abd7ad8bff9b1874e3903aa55f33ef887d95096a.

diff --git a/linguistic/source/lngsvcmgr.cxx b/linguistic/source/lngsvcmgr.cxx
index caa7d09..9b4cc9f 100644
--- a/linguistic/source/lngsvcmgr.cxx
+++ b/linguistic/source/lngsvcmgr.cxx
@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ uno::Sequence< lang::Locale > SAL_CALL
  static bool IsEqSvcList( const uno::Sequence< OUString > &rList1,
                          const uno::Sequence< OUString > &rList2 )
  {
-    // returns true if both sequences are equal
+    // returns sal_True if both sequences are equal

      bool bRes = false;
      sal_Int32 nLen = rList1.getLength();

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to