Hi Christian,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:18 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> But obviously not enough. The bug that made MS-Office flag LO-produced
> files as corrupt for example is one of those bugs that prevent use in
Sure sure - the real hope is that (once we are clean with it - still
work to do there) - we can use Microsoft's new binary document format
validator to automatically regression test this. Sadly the thing is not
open-source, so we can't easily use it except on Windows, but ... hey.
> Forget about the term. Think of it as "would have been the version
> released in OOo times with the known bugs".
:-) that is hard to judge; people's memory gets rosier and rosier with
the passage of time, there were some pretty hideous bugs we shipped with
I think.
> And now to the decision: How should the release be flagged on the
> download-page?
> * yellow exclamation mark/warning as it is now.
> http://www.libreoffice.org/themes/libo/images/warning.png
So - not that :-)
> * blue info / i icon
> http://www.libreoffice.org/themes/libo/images/information.png
Looks great to me. I suggest we also put it at the top of the page as
well.
> * green tick/OK icon like 3.3.3
> http://www.libreoffice.org/themes/libo/images/tick.png
> * other (please specify): ______________________________
:-) we can keep green for the ultra-stable release I guess.
How does that sound ? :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
