On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Maarten Hoes <[email protected]> wrote: > > However, doesnt the 'make it run it all in one call' implementation conflict > at least a little with the previously stated desire to run the code coverage > on other tests than just 'make check' ?
again being flexible does not mean that one could not propose sensible 'default'. > Its the main reason I split > everything up in -before' and '-after' parts, so that you can easily run any > test you desire in between. yeah that is a great feature... I have not removed it in anyway. just expended things a bit to implify my use case. Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
