On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:48 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud <[email protected]> wrote:
> Never-the-less I still think it is a 'Bad Thing(tm)' to have a > pre-commit hook altering on the fly what need to be committed... so I > suggest we stick with the 'warn but do no harm' approach (rather than > merely fixing/reverting the commit above). As somebody bitten hard by this behavior I can only say: Yes, please. No hook should ever think itself to be clever enough to change state without backup(*), even if it would be bugfree. Best, Bjoern (*) And some obscure named file silently created in /tmp is not a backup .... -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
