Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:04 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > > there were more patches not yet pushed, so I've applied them. I didn't > > touch the files which differed only by whitespace. And I didn't delete > > comments containing bugids and text. This I would like to leave for the > > experts :-) > > You were right not to delete those comments entirely... they can be > useful. > Yep - though in general, these '#123456#' bug ids can be elided - the usually-followed convention is, that those are bugids of StarDivision's old internal bugtracking system (and '#b123456#' the ones from Sun's internal bugtracker) - so they're of no value to the general public. Public OOo bugs are usually marked as '#i12345#' - still worth checking though via
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=<bugid> whether just by chance someone forgot to add the 'i'. So in this case, it would have been ok to remove the bugid, but leave the rest of the (quite useful) comment. Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpPjCCQsasln.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
