On 03/12/10 02:26, Kevin Hunter wrote: > I'm absolutely for this, especially in terms of getting any/all > necessaries rewritten in C++ ... but not right now. As others have > stated, like it not, the current product uses Java (e.g. Base) and I > believe it would be foolhardy to default to a build that is not likely > to be deployed to end-users. When (if?) the code has been gutted of > Java, it might be time to revisit this motion, but now is not that time. > > If the conversion to C++ is an important goal (and long-term, I do > believe it is), I think it would be better put on the wiki as a > not-so-easy/short hack.
Where do I start :-) Seeing as Base is where I want to work, this seems an obvious thing to do. I'm guessing that building without Java, then running some tests (smoketest? what?) and seeing what breaks is a good idea. If someone can guide me where to go, I'll try and get started (homelife permitting :-) Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
