https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85170
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org Status|REOPENED |UNCONFIRMED Keywords| |needsUXEval Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #19 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to vic from comment #18) > (In reply to Andreas Heinisch from comment #16) > > Imho it is a feature. Imagine a table with hidden rows where you store some > > information and you may forget about it. Then you do an autofill either via > > GUI or macro and overwrite it. After the save you have no chance to recover > > your overwritten data anymore. You don't even know that you have overwritten > > something. The same holds for filtered data. > > Then that calls for a warning before or after autofill, to ask you whether > you accept overwriting - just like it warns you when you paste data onto > cells that already contain data. > Or - an option in Tools > Options to customize this behaviour. > > Instead, you eliminated an important feature to intentionally work with > hidden rows/cols. > Imagine you have hundreds or thousads of rows - would you find it practical > to keep them all unhidden/ungrouped in order to autofill? Let's loop in UX. So the proposal is to stay with the original request, but with the condition that a warning is implemented at the same time (an option is dangerous because as we have seen countless times, people set options, forget about them and then scream about losing data). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
