Hi, I have questions regarding bug/fix workflow. From my understanding, developers and QA wiki pages provide only partial answers.
To make it simple, I have a bug. Its status is NEW. I produced a patch to fix the problem. ---- I updated it by setting "Assigned to:" with my email and changing status to ASSIGNED. (And I guess I should have done it as soon as working on the bug). It is not clear that I have to make these two changes, one page dealing of easyhack (Development/Easy_Hacks) mentions changing "Assigned to" email but not changing status ---- I push the patch to gerrit. Who changes the status to resolved and when? A scheme on wiki QA/BSA/BugReport_Details suggests that ASSIGNED becomes RESOLVED when "Development is finished". Does development finished includes code review, merged into master... ? ---- Maybe not (only) QA related: Who commits from Gerrit into master ? In which release ? How QA team knows the bug has to be verified ? ---- Regards Philippe _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
