On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> My suggestions :
> + fix bug fdo#85215 : done
> + change the default value of option UpdateReferenceOnSort from true
> to false for backward compatibility
So - we punted this default decision to the UX team.
> Main bug reports related to this problem:
My concern is that I don't have time to waste with interminable ranting
bug comments by all & sundry ;-) or lists of duplicates, or "change
default to this / that" - all of that is in-hand, and it is a ~one-liner
to change the default now [ and perhaps a single unit test change ].
The only open question is: given what is in master today - are there
-well-defined- clearly specified cases that continue not to work [ with
the default set to the user's preferred state ]. Are there clear
comparisons vs. what competing products do in exactly those corner cases
too ?
Can we get a tracker for exactly these outstanding issues and no
others ? can each of those issues be a succinct, crisp, clear statement
of a real issue with the current state of master; and nothing else =) or
(more ideally) we can confirm that there are no outstanding issues
[ modulo the non-interesting ones I outline above ].
Thanks !
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/