On 10/24/2014 02:59 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen a > > "Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity > on it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it > is open and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a > newer version than the version reported in the original report to know > that the bug is still present -- sometimes a bug is inadvertently fixed > over time and just never closed." > > warning in one of the EasyHacks > (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30425). > > I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's > worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks > when sending these, please? What would be the rationale for skipping them for easy hacks? These get fixed just as inadvertently as other bugs. Just curious
Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
