Jay, *, Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the best interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi. It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over their life span.
Otherwise, during triage we should all strive to be courteous. By itself, the automated message delivered "*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug xxxxx ***" is a bit too terse in closing a NEW issue as duplicate. But believe including a simple "thank you" for posting would suffice. If too many bugs like fdo#82701 are making it through, then the Bugzilla and BSA "duplicate" issue filters may need to be improved. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
